8 Comments
Jun 14, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

This Huang system could be used to remove tritium from the 1.2 million tons of Japanese polluted water becuase the weak force in the EVO reaction is long ranged.

The weak interaction has a very short effective range (around 10^−17 to 10^−16 m). At distances around 10^−18 meters, the weak interaction has a strength of a similar magnitude to the electromagnetic force, but this starts to decrease exponentially with increasing distance.

Once the distance of the weak force interaction is greater than the surface of a proton or a neutron inside a nucleus then the weak force will become impotent.

If the weak force in the EVO reaction is long ranged, then the EVO reaction must be a vacuum based reaction. In the vacuum based reaction, the electromagnetic and the weak force combine into a single electroweak force. The weak force will then act just like the electromagnetic force. The strong force also goes away and transmutation results.

The EVO reaction is either a vacuum reaction as claimed by Rossi or a nuclear reaction moderated by particles as claimed by Parkhomov. The EVO reaction is very unlikely to be both. This means that if the purification of the 1.2 million tons of polluted water is possible, then the reaction must be a vacuum reaction and Parkhomov's theory is totally wrong and Rossi's theory is correct.

The following is my reasoning in detail as follows:

According to current thinking when the universe began, all the four forces of nature were consolidated into a single force, but as the universe expanded, a change of state occurred where these four forces became separate and distinct from each other. The weak force became very short ranged, the electromagnetic force remained long ranged and the strong force became strong. But that change of state added the Higgs field to coordinate the actions of the electromagnetic and the weak force. The Higgs field gave the W and Z boson a huge mass and this makes these weak force carriers very short ranged. But the photon was kept at zero mass as the electromagnetic long range force charrier.

I beleive that the Higgs field can be disrupted and removed at least within a micro sized volume of space time. I call that volume an exotic vacuum object (EVO). With that change in the force structure inside the EVO, what will happen. Most likely the forces of nature will revert back to the way that all of the four forces acted as a single unified force when the universe first began.

The weak force would become strong again. That means that the W and Z boson would become massless again and behave just like the photon. Any energetic excitation of the EVO would not only produce EMF radiation but also long range "weak force" emissions. This new regime in force projection is now electroweak force projection.

Any unstable isotopes far from the radiating EVO would then become stable.

The strong force would now become weak again and any atomic structure that entered the volume of the EVO would revert to its fundamental particle content... "quark soup".

If we can change the modulus of the forces of nature so that they behave like the did before the Higgs field made its presence felt, then some interesting space-time engineering could be done.

The stabilization of tritium contaminate water might be done by placing a EVO source in the center of a stainless steel vessel that supports a flow of contaminate water around that source. The speed of the flow could be adjusted so that all the tritium is stabilized before exiting the vessel.

The EVO source could be a active Parkhomov reactor or a wood pecker or a Bin-Juine Huang's cavitation driven excess heat system.

Because the heat exchanger is so compacted, Huang system is well suited for tritium neutralization.

Parkhomov could determine the maximum distance from his electroweak source that an unstable isotope must be placed to insure that stabilization occurs.

Parkhomov most likely has access to radioactive isotopes that we here in the west do not have.

Expand full comment
Jun 16, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

curbina

The issue of the dissolved oxygen may as well explain the many divergences in results with the same basic effect. I asked BJ Huang what water they used and he says it was RO treated water (reverse osmosis purified este). It was also mentioned that colder water tended to get better COP (not always but there was a trend). Oxygen saturation of water is inversely proportional to temperature, meaning that colder water can always contain more dissolved oxygen. In absence of an express aeration step in the preparation of the water colder water will achieve slightly more concentration of O2 by difusión through exposed to air surfaces. This would explain a lot of the variation. After this I think that an aerator phase is necessary to include for preparing water to be used in cavitation experiments. Omasa’s vibratory Vanes cavitate an aerate at the same time so it May explain why it works so well.

Expand full comment
Jun 14, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

The results are really encouraging and also beget more questions than answers. I asked Dr. Huang what kind of water they used and also If analysis of the water was performed, I hope he can respond, that would reveal some more relevant data. I also asked him the thickness of the copper foil he used, as it looked thicker than Al foil. Roger Stringham also got Nickel and Copper foils damaged by ultrasound.

Expand full comment